The Immaculate Deception: Breaking Down Peter Navarro’s Election Irregularities Report

26,908 views
Photo courtesy @markuswinkler

Annie Peterson | Civil Patriot

From the findings of this report, it is possible to infer what may well have been a coordinated strategy to effectively stack the election deck against the Trump-Pence ticket.”

Navarro Voter Fraud Report
We knew it was coming, of course. The fraud allegations have been swirling around us like an Oklahoma twister over the family homestead. But it’s always nice to see things compiled into one handy document, and that’s what Peter Navarro (advisor to President Donald Trump) has handed us in today’s 36-page Election Irregularities report (pdf). 

NAVARRO’S FINDINGS
Navarro’s summarized findings are divided into six separate categories: 

  • Outright Voter Fraud: Found in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and Wisconsin with suspected fraud found in Michigan and Pennsylvania
  • Ballot Mishandling: Found in Georgia, Nevada, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin
  • Contestable Contest Fouls: Found in all six states
  • Equal Protection Clause Violations: Found in all six states
  • Voting Machine Irregularities: Found in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Pennsylvania with suspected irregularities in Wisconsin
  • Significant Statistical Anomalies: Found in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin

HOW THE REST OF THE DOCUMENT IS BROKEN DOWN
This crux of this comprehensive report is broken down into 8 separate tables, which lay out the specifics of the irregularities by topic and by state. 

Table 1: Tackles Trump’s midnight ride through Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, with specific numbers that point out the odd shift from Trump Red to Biden Blue. 

Table 2: Covers the election irregularities in the six battleground states (from the original table) but adds the Biden victory margins and possible illegal ballots. 

Table 3: Lays out specifics related to outright voter fraud in each of the six states: 

  • Bribery: Found in Arizona and Nevada
  • Fake Ballot Manufacturing & Destruction of Legal Ballots: Found in Arizona and Georgia, suspected in Nevada and Pennsylvania 
  • Indefinitely Confined Voter Abuses: Found in Wisconsin, suspected in Georgia and Nevada
  • Ineligible Voters & Voters Who Voted in Multiple States: Found in Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada
  • Dead Voters & Ghost Voters: Found in Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada, suspected in Michigan and Pennsylvania
  • Counting Ballots Multiple Times: Found in Wisconsin, suspected in Michigan, Nevada, and Pennsylvania
  • Illegal Out of State Voters: Found in Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada, suspected in Pennsylvania

Table 4: Tackles ballot mishandling in the battleground states. Here’s how it breaks down: 

  • No Voter ID Check: Found in Wisconsin, suspected in Michigan and Nevada
  • Signature Match Check Abuses: Found in Georgia, Nevada, and Pennsylvania
  • “Naked Ballots” Lacking Outer Envelope: Found in Pennsylvania, suspected in Michigan
  • Broken Chain of Custody and Unauthorized Ballot Handling or Movements: Found in Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin
  • Ballots Accepted without Postmarks & Backdating of Ballots: Suspected in Michigan and Wisconsin

Table 5: Covers contestable process fouls in the battleground states. Broken down, it looks like this: 

  • Abuses of Poll Watchers and Observers: Found in all six states
  • Mail-in and Absentee Ballot Rules Violated Contrary to State Law: Found in Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin
  • Voters Not Properly Registered Allowed to Vote: Found in Georgia, Nevada, and Wisconsin, suspected in Michigan and Pennsylvania
  • Illegal Campaigning at Poll Locations: Suspected in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin
  • Ballots Cured by Poll Workers or Voters Contrary to Law: Found in all six states

Table 6: Deals with equal protection clause violations in the six battleground states. Here’s what he found: 

  • Higher Standards of Certification and ID Verification Applied to In-Person Voters: Found in all six states
  • Different Standards of Ballot Curing: Found in all six states
  • Differential & Partisan Poll Watcher Treatment: Found in all six states

Table 7: Deals with voting machine irregularities. Here’s what Navarro discovered: 

  • Large-Scale Voting Machine Inaccuracies: Found in Arizona, Michigan, and Nevada
  • Inexplicable Vote Switching and Vote Surges in Favor of Biden: Found in Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan

Table 8: Breaks down the statistical anomalies in the key battleground states. Here’s what he discovered: 

  • Significant Changes in Absentee Ballot Rejection Rates from Previous Elections: Found in Georgia, Nevada, and Pennsylvania
  • Excessively High Voter Turnout (at times exceeding 100%): Found in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin
  • Statistically Improbably Vote Totals Based on Party Registration & Historical Patterns: Found in Arizona and Wisconsin
  • Unusual Vote Surges: Found in Georgia and Wisconsin, suspected in Michigan

IN CONCLUSION
The report ends with a summary of each individual (key battleground) state, honing in on the areas where they were most at fault. Summing it all up, Navarro says: “If these election irregularities are not fully investigated prior to Inauguration Day and thereby effectively allowed to stand, this nation runs the very real risk of never being able to have a fair presidential election again – with the down-ballot Senate races scheduled for January 5 in Georgia an initial test case of this looming risk.” 

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.